A Clay Jar

Encouraging, comforting, and urging you to live lives worthy of God, who calls you into his kingdom and glory. (1 Thess. 2:12 NIV)

Two Revelations: Creation and the Bible

Published on:

Last updated on:

Two revelations: Creation and the Bible

God has revealed himself to us in three very distinct ways. The greatest of these is in the person of Jesus. When we see Jesus, we see God (John 14:9). But we have two additional revelations available.

General Revelation

The first of these is often called general revelation. It is the creation itself. The psalmist tells us that the heavens declare the glory of God, revealing knowledge without spoken words (Ps. 19:1-3). Paul builds on that in Romans 1:18-20, where he claims that God’s eternal power and divine nature are clearly seen in what has been made.

There are definite limitations with general revelation. It tells us much in general terms about the power and glory of God. But it does so without words. So, it can only take us so far.

Special Revelation

General revelation can be thought of as an indirect revelation. It is what we can derive from what God does. But special revelation is quite different. It is revelation that God directly gives to us. This revelation is given through individuals, generally prophets and apostles, and we find it recorded today in the pages of the Bible.

Special revelation gives us much more detailed information about God, what he has done, is doing, and will do. It is God’s instruction to us. So, the special revelation we find in the Bible is more helpful in knowing and understanding God than the general revelation we see in creation.

Compatible Revelations

While there are two distinct forms of revelation given to us by God, it is important to recognize that they are both from God. Therefore, they are both true. There can be no real conflict between them. Any apparent conflict between them is because we misunderstand what he is telling us in one or the other of them. Or even both.

Science is, in short, the study of general revelation—of the creation. Theology is, on the other hand, the study of special revelation. It is important to remember that both fields of study are human endeavors and are subject to mistakes.

Origins

The Bible, God’s special revelation, affirms that God is the creator of all that is. But, apart from the expression “God said, and it was,” it provides little information about how God created the universe, the planet we live on, and the life that inhabits it, including our own. The Bible tells us the who and the why of creation but not the how.

As it investigates the creation, science works to unravel its how. While some scientists venture into trying to provide answers to the who and why questions, they are generally outside the scope of science.

While there are dissenters, the general consensus among scientists, both secular and religious, is that the Big Bang is the best explanation for the origins of the universe. And the Theory of Evolution best describes how life, once it started, diversified into the vast array we see today.

Has science answered every question about the Big Bang and Evolution? Certainly not. Science continues to explore and refine both of these as time goes on. And, no doubt, they will look different in the future. That is just the nature of science.

Some Words of Caution

Accepting the first few chapters of Genesis as accurate scientifically and historically is certainly the most straightforward approach to Genesis. And I do not fault anyone who is content to take that approach. Stepping beyond that simple reading can be challenging.

One of the challenges you will face is that it puts you at odds with those who hold tightly to a literal view. Sometimes, their opposition to other views can become quite vehement. You may even find some who will challenge your salvation. Don’t let them hold you back if you feel the Spirit’s lead to explore the science of creation.

The second challenge is, in my mind, much more significant. Be wary of the false claim that you cannot believe both the Bible and science. That lie can lead you to too easily abandon the Bible if you become convinced it is at odds with established science. Hold tightly to the inspiration, truthfulness, and authority of the Scripture. But that does not mean you have to accept someone else’s interpretation of what it means.

Remember that both the creation and the Scripture are God’s revelation to us. They are not at odds with each other. Regardless of what some may claim.

Conclusion

I know that many people who will read this post, along with the ones that came before it, will disagree with me—sometimes a little and sometimes a lot. And that is ok with me. My intent is not to convince you of the rightness of my position. It is more to explain how one believer has come to understand the revelations that God has given us in the creation and his inspired word.

I will follow this with a comment with links to the earlier posts in this series and some posts I wrote about the theology of the first eleven chapters of Genesis.

  • The Bible and Science (1/4/2025) - When the Bible and science appear to conflict, the issue is understanding what God tells us in his two revelations: the Bible and creation.
  • A Reluctant Journey to the Big Bang (1/11/2025) - The more time I spent looking into the Big Bang and Theory of Evolution, the more I began to accept them as largely true.
  • The Age of the Universe (1/18/2025) - How can we reconcile the age disparity of the creation between what proponents of the Big Bang claim and what Genesis seems to tell us?
  • The Theory of Evolution (1/25/2025) - The Bible does not directly support the Theory of Evolution. But it does leave open that possibility if you recognize it is not a science book.
  • Two Revelations: Creation and the Bible (2/1/2025) - God has given us two revelation. The first is the creation and is general in nature. The second is the Bible. And it is more detailed.

Additional Related Posts

Subscribe to A Clay Jar

If you have found value in this post, please consider subscribing to A Clay Jar so that you don't miss any other posts. 

Just an old clay jar that God continues to see fit to use in his kingdom's work. I am retired, married with 2 children, and 4 grandchildren. I have followed Jesus for many years. And I love to share what He has given me from His word.

A Note to Readers

The views expressed here are solely mine and do not necessarily reflect those of any other person, group, or organization. While I believe they reflect the teachings of the Bible, I am a fallible human and subject to misunderstanding. Please feel free to leave any comments or questions about this post in the comments section below. I am always interested in your feedback.

2 thoughts on “Two Revelations: Creation and the Bible”

  1. Ed, I wrote to you when you began this Bible & Science series to say how much I was looking forward to it. I should have written again earlier to say that I was most encouraged by what you wrote. There was nothing I took issue with and much that helped. I wasn’t raised in a Christian family. Mum was a believer, but she was the only one (glad to say she was the one who made the greatest impact on me – I saw the truth of Christ reflected in her life). What touched me most deeply was to see that your life and my life have come from opposite ends as far as science and religion concerned – but over the years God has brought us to pretty much the same place. I’m 68 and gave my life to Jesus in 1977 – it will be 50 years in 2027. I went to university in Cambridge, studied science (Genetics) and had a career in science before retiring at 60. More and more I saw that, as you put it, both the revelations of science and the bible are true, telling a single story. I don’t find any conflict now and also (most importantly) I’m comfortable that there is a lot of stuff God does that is simply beyond human understanding. He has left me with enough to do putting his word into practice in my life, without worrying about how old the universe is. I’ve got friends who get wound up about all sorts of perceived conflicts between science and faith that really don’t bother me any more. Thank you again.

    Reply

Leave a Comment